A measure that determines the consistency of results across multiple administrations is assessing:

The measure that evaluates the consistency of results across multiple administrations is referred to as test-retest reliability. This concept is crucial in appraisal and testing, as it focuses on the stability of scores over time. When a test is administered to the same subjects on two different occasions, a strong correlation between the two sets of results indicates that the test yields reliable and consistent outcomes regardless of when it is given.

In this context, test-retest reliability emphasizes the importance of temporal consistency in the measurement tool being used. If a test measures some construct accurately, one would expect that individuals scoring similarly on the first administration would score similarly again when the test is repeated after a certain period, assuming no significant changes in the subjects' underlying abilities or the conditions measured.

Other concepts, such as internal consistency, criterion-related validity, and construct validity, focus on different aspects of measurement reliability and validity. Internal consistency assesses whether different items on the same test produce similar results, while criterion-related validity evaluates how well one measure predicts an outcome based on another measure. Construct validity, on the other hand, looks at whether a test accurately measures the theoretical construct it purports to measure. These are distinct from the concept of test-retest reliability, which specifically addresses the stability of scores over time